3 years ago

459 note(s)

Reblogged From:
shoelust
This shoe = art = architecture
shoelust:

Christian Dior Couture

This shoe = art = architecture

shoelust:

Christian Dior Couture

3 years ago

3 note(s)

High Quality
Saskia de Brauw & Kate by Boris Ovini for Exhibition#1

Saskia de Brauw & Kate by Boris Ovini for Exhibition#1

3 years ago

High Quality
Cephalopods make for great headgear.

Kirsi Pyrhonen for Barneys Holiday 2010 Catalogue by Magnus Unnar

Cephalopods make for great headgear.

Kirsi Pyrhonen for Barneys Holiday 2010 Catalogue by Magnus Unnar

3 years ago

High Quality
                      
Keira Knightley wearing this gorgeous number by Chanel at the London premiere of Never Let Me Go, based on the novel of the same name by Kashuo Ishiguro. If you like dystopian lit, read this book and then watch the film.  
Back to the dress. It reminds me of pearls, shells, and seafoam. The little details seem so delicate and I think that goes together perfectly with KK’s frame.  It reminds me of that painting “Aphrodite” by Botticelli. Yes, I realize Aphrodite isn’t wearing clothes, but its the sea imagery, foam, etc that reminds me of the dress.

NOTE: Every few months I get this urge to have some kind of consistent post. I tried doing “Mask Monday” when I first started this blog.  Every Monday I would post some interesting photo that had something to do with masks.  Mask Monday lasted for about 4 weeks. Basically, a complete failure.
But I have that urge again, and this time I’m determined to actually keep going with it. So today, Sunday October 17th, is the beginning of “I Love Your Dress.” Every Sunday I’ll post a picture of someone whose dress provokes the response, “I Love Your Dress.” Normally when I actually love someone’s dress, I’m very excited about it. But I feel like it seems more mature if you can give out a compliment nonchalantly and without excessive enthusiasm. But if you are really drunk, on alcohol, cough syrup, or oxycotin/related hormones, excessive enthusiasm can be excused.    

                      

Keira Knightley wearing this gorgeous number by Chanel at the London premiere of Never Let Me Go, based on the novel of the same name by Kashuo Ishiguro. If you like dystopian lit, read this book and then watch the film.  

Back to the dress. It reminds me of pearls, shells, and seafoam. The little details seem so delicate and I think that goes together perfectly with KK’s frame.  It reminds me of that painting “Aphrodite” by Botticelli. Yes, I realize Aphrodite isn’t wearing clothes, but its the sea imagery, foam, etc that reminds me of the dress.

NOTE: Every few months I get this urge to have some kind of consistent post. I tried doing “Mask Monday” when I first started this blog.  Every Monday I would post some interesting photo that had something to do with masks.  Mask Monday lasted for about 4 weeks. Basically, a complete failure.

But I have that urge again, and this time I’m determined to actually keep going with it. So today, Sunday October 17th, is the beginning of “I Love Your Dress.” Every Sunday I’ll post a picture of someone whose dress provokes the response, “I Love Your Dress.” Normally when I actually love someone’s dress, I’m very excited about it. But I feel like it seems more mature if you can give out a compliment nonchalantly and without excessive enthusiasm. But if you are really drunk, on alcohol, cough syrup, or oxycotin/related hormones, excessive enthusiasm can be excused.    

4 years ago

34 note(s)

Reblogged From:
jpeoplemagazine

4 years ago

317 note(s)

Reblogged From:
yfm7
High Quality
Current Mood
yfm7:

comicallyvintage:

I just want to wake up from this nightmare …

Current Mood

yfm7:

comicallyvintage:

I just want to wake up from this nightmare …

4 years ago

3 note(s)

High Quality
So beautiful…I want to be part of something like this!
"Thanks to Jeroen Koolhaas and Dre Urhahn, one of Rio’s bleakest  neighborhoods now has a permanent rainbow. As part of their project “O  Morro” (which literally translated means “the hill” but really signifies  the presence of “the slum”), the Dutch artists have enlisted the  community to transform the facades of 34 houses (about 7,000  square meters!) into a colorful community art project. Local residents  who picked up a brush received a small salary (the painting took about a  month) and an education in the production process. Koolhaas and Urhahn,  who have been painting favelas for the past two years as part  of a greater initiative to transform the hillside slums into places that  residents are proud to live in, plan to return to Brazil to finish  painting the entire hill.”
http://tmagazine.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/23/favela-fab/?partner=rss&emc=rss

So beautiful…I want to be part of something like this!

"Thanks to Jeroen Koolhaas and Dre Urhahn, one of Rio’s bleakest neighborhoods now has a permanent rainbow. As part of their project “O Morro” (which literally translated means “the hill” but really signifies the presence of “the slum”), the Dutch artists have enlisted the community to transform the facades of 34 houses (about 7,000 square meters!) into a colorful community art project. Local residents who picked up a brush received a small salary (the painting took about a month) and an education in the production process. Koolhaas and Urhahn, who have been painting favelas for the past two years as part of a greater initiative to transform the hillside slums into places that residents are proud to live in, plan to return to Brazil to finish painting the entire hill.”

http://tmagazine.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/23/favela-fab/?partner=rss&emc=rss

4 years ago

High Quality
cerolink:

Fernando Vicente: Anatomias

cerolink:

Fernando Vicente: Anatomias

4 years ago

1 note(s)

Reblogged From:
frozenwarnings
High Quality
frozenwarnings:

Paul Delvaux: Les promeneuses (1947).

frozenwarnings:

Paul Delvaux: Les promeneuses (1947).

4 years ago

1 note(s)

Art and Propaganda

http://www.aiga.org/content.cfm/art-and-propaganda

by Milton Glaser

February 26, 2008

On February 15, Milton Glaser gave the keynote address at “Where the Truth Lies: A Symposium on Propaganda Today,” sponsored by the School of Visual Arts. The following is his transcript.

Some years ago I was in Fez, Morocco, with my wife, Shirley. We had hired a guide and were being escorted through the Medina, the ancient part of the city that had 160,000 inhabitants and no telephones—although our guide assured us that he could reach anyone in the old city within two hours by word of mouth. We stopped momentarily to look into a courtyard through an open door where about 50 boys between the ages of 4 and 5 were seated on the ground, reading out loud.

“How long will these boys be at school?” I asked our guide.

“Generally, two years. After that, almost all of them will go to work.”

“What do they study?” I asked.

“The Koran.”

“Nothing else?”

“No.”

The memory of that scene and conversation has haunted me for over 25 years. These poor boys would never be able to question their own beliefs and could never understand how those beliefs had been systematically pounded into their brains. Every culture has its own way of indoctrinating its citizenry. In our culture, this indoctrination occurs through the use of advertising, television, schooling and the way news is reported. Because this indoctrination is so difficult to identify, it becomes essential to question all the beliefs we cherish most.

We live in an ocean of persuasion, most of it unrelenting and invisible. I once described making a low-calorie Greek salad for my wife and myself on a warm spring day in the country. After I chopped the tomatoes, onions, peppers and cucumber, I found a package of French feta cheese in the refrigerator, which I crumbled into the bowl. I glanced at the back of the package. It read: 70 calories per serving. Below that, in smaller type, it read: number of servings per package–7. I had just added 500 calories to our modest lunch.

How does a tablespoon of feta become a serving? Everyone here today knows exactly how this happens. It’s so trivial, so banal it hardly seems worth mentioning. Of course, I should have paid attention and read the label before I dumped the feta into the salad. Multiply this trivial event a million times and you begin to understand today’s constant and relentless subversion of what is real.

As someone involved in the communication business, I often find myself confused by whether I am an agent of propaganda. The most obvious examples of my own interest in persuasion are a series of buttons I’ve created for The Nation—the magazine, not the country.

A while ago, I was looking for a definition of art’s purpose. I came across one that I liked; in fact, I liked it so much that I used it for the title of a film that was made about my work. It’s from Horace, the Roman philosopher and critic, who wrote, “The purpose of art is to inform and delight.” I’ve been thinking about the purpose of art all my life, and Horace helped me to arrive at an understanding. Art is a survival mechanism for the human species. Otherwise, it never would have lasted so long.

But how does it work? How does it affect us? Primarily, it makes us attentive to the reality of our own life. The first cave paintings made its viewers attentive to the spirit and character of the animals their lives depended on. Sixteen thousand years later, Guernica made us conscious of how cruel the death of the innocent could be. Picasso and Cezanne help us understand that things can be looked at from several points of view at the same time. When we pass a landscape and think of how much it resembles a Cezanne painting, we become aware that Cezanne has made us attentive to how we see a landscape. Picasso and Seurat anticipated and illuminated the science of the 19th century, demonstrating that a landscape is an accumulation of color fragments and spaces. Art may be the only truth we can ever know.

The experience of art can be considered a form of meditation. By suppressing the debris of everyday life and the illusion that desire creates, meditation enables us to observe without judging. In this way, what is real to us becomes visible.

Recollecting Horace’s description of art’s purpose, he said “to inform and delight,” not “to persuade and delight.” Informing us makes us stronger. Persuading us robs us of our ability to observe things for ourselves. Propaganda cannot be described without its link to persuasion.

Propaganda is not necessarily a lie, but it affects our neurological system and brain in the same way. It undermines our ability to understand our own reality. It makes us more infantile and dependent. It substitutes an alien authority for our own perception.

Not all belief is culturally manufactured. A large part of what we believe seems to come from a universal moral code that is genetically programmed in every human being. They are:

  1. Doing no harm to others
  2. Fairness
  3. Loyalty and shared solidarity with your group
  4. Respect for authority
  5. Fear of contamination or the celebration of purity

Every society and political system emphasizes the parts of this moral construct to serve its own needs. My moral indignation and anti-adminstration activity may, in fact, derive more from fear of authority than any other motivation. Those on the right don’t have trouble with authority but are driven up the wall by such issues as same-sex marriage, which is a contamination issue. On the other hand, my parents, who were anything but right-wingers, were horrified when I told them I had eaten a clam.

Propaganda not only inhibits our sense of reality, it frequently causes us to act against our own interests. It does this by affecting the primitive parts of the brain that are unaffected by logic or consciousness but respond to images and symbols.

The short recent history of the Bush administration has demonstrated this principle. By using fear and endless repetition, the government has subverted our mythology and character and it has processed the American people into accepting a dramatic erosion of our civil rights and, perhaps most appallingly, to approve of torture. Sadly, the phenomenon is scarcely unique. In fact, it may be the inevitable narrative of human civilization. The intersection of fear and persuasion has created the world as we know it.

The mind’s ability to alter itself is the source of human freedom. Information expands the capacity of the mind to change. Persuasion limits that capacity. Beliefs must be held lightly, because certainty is frequently the enemy of truth. Or, put another way, to free ourselves from the insidious grip of propaganda, we can follow the example of the scientist and psychologist William James, who was said to have loved questions more than answers.

About the Author: Milton Glaser is among the most celebrated graphic designers in the United States. He has had the distinction of one-man-shows at the Museum of Modern Art and the Georges Pompidou Center. In 2004 he was selected for the lifetime achievement award by the Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum. As a Fulbright scholar, Glaser studied with the painter Giorgio Morandi in Bologna. Today, he is a spokesman for ethical practice in design. He opened Milton Glaser, Inc., in 1974, and continues to produce work in many fields of design.